September 28, 2007
California Electoral Initiative: D.O.A.
The California Electoral Initiative #07-0032, or the Orwellian named Presidential Election Reform Act (pdf) as backers like to call it, was a power grab attempt by Republicans to change the state's winner-take-all system so that 53 of its 55 electoral votes can be divvied up based on how each congressional district votes.
Even if the remaining two of the 55 electoral votes goes to the popular vote winner, this change means that the Republicans can capture as many as 20 electoral votes in California in 2008, big enough to change the outcome of the presidential election.
Now the L.A. Times reports the initiative is all but dead:
A proposed California initiative campaign that could have helped Republicans hold on to the White House in 2008 was a shambles Thursday night, as two of its key consultants quit.This is good news, thanks largely to a grassroots effort to defeat the initiative, but the story doesn't end here. Several things about the initiative smelled fishy, and this may not be their last attempt to steal California's electoral votes.
For one thing, Hendrik Hertzberg of the New Yorker reports this about the initiative's drafter, Thomas Hiltachk (emphasis mine):
Nominally, the sponsor of No. 07-0032 is Californians for Equal Representation. But that’s just a letterhead—there’s no such organization. Its address is the office suite of Bell, McAndrews & Hiltachk, the law firm for the California Republican Party, and its covering letter is signed by Thomas W. Hiltachk, the firm’s managing partner and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s personal lawyer for election matters. Hiltachk and his firm have been involved in many well-financed ballot initiatives before, including the recall that put Arnold in Sacramento. They specialize in initiatives that are the opposite of what they sound like—the Fair Pay Workplace Flexibility Act of 2006, for example. It would have raised the state minimum wage slightly—by a lesser amount than it has since been raised—and, in the fine print, would have made it impossible ever to raise it again except by a two-thirds vote in both houses of the legislature, while, for good measure, eliminating overtime for millions of workers.Also, the one large donor referred to in the L.A. Times article is a group called Take Initiative America (TIA) which turns out to be based not in California but in Union, Missouri (population: 7,000). Its donation of $175,000 arrived a day after the group was formed by a lawyer named Charles A. Hurth III.
A San Francisco Chronicle article revealed some interesting things about Mr. Hurth (emphasis mine):
It's not the first time Hurth has been part of an effort that Democrats say has been aimed at changing the outcome of a presidential election. In 2004, he was the legal agent behind a GOP-funded group called Choices for America, which solicited donations from Republicans for another controversial signature drive - to help independent candidate Ralph Nader get on the presidential election ballot in key states, documents show...The article also notes a 1990 lawsuit that shows what a class act Mr. Hurth is:
Hurth, then a third-year law student at St. Louis University, was taken to court by a young woman who said he grabbed her in a bar and bit her on the buttocks so hard she required medical attention - then laughed and high-fived his friends.There's also this bit from the article:
Hurth donated $2,000 in March to the Giuliani campaign, and his fundraising associate in Choices for America, Nevada-based conservative strategist Steve Wark, has been a major donor and fundraiser for Giuliani.Hurth and Hiltachk. Donor and organizer. Both veterans of political shenanigans. Both supporters -- or connected to supporters -- of Giuliani. Both connected to an initiative that can possibly make Giuliani the next President of the United States. Coincidence?
Giuliani's camp denies having anything to do with the initiative, but it's obvious that the major players pushing this measure aren't as interested in "equal representation" of voters as much as they're interested in rigging the system in favor of the GOP.
Hurth and TIA are now being investigated by the Fair Political Practices Commission of California after Democrats charged that the group is hiding the source of its money. This nondisclosure was also cited by Hiltachk as one of the reasons he resigned, although considering that he didn't return TIA's $175,000, I suspect the committee's inability to attract support and not the source of TIA's funds was the more compelling reason for his resignation.
I am all for changing our electoral college system to a system that more accurately reflects the popular vote. However, it should be done nationwide or not at all. Doing it only in California, the biggest electoral prize in the union, and not in the red states where urban areas lean towards the Democrats benefits only the Republican party and not the electorate.
For now, the initiative is dead, but there's no reason to think they won't try again:
"We want to to make sure this is not the Freddy Krueger of initiatives," [Democratic consultant Chris] Lehane said today, "that comes back to life. We'll continue to monitor it."Technorati Tags:
+Save/Share | |
Links to this post:
(Dare to Know)
-- Epistularum Liber Primus, Horace
Wonk (noun): def. A political nerd. Know spelled backwards.
Wonky Muse is the other Filipino American female political blogger. The sane, liberal one.
Talking Points Memo
The Carpetbagger Report
The Huffington Post
follow me on Twitter
image: le sarcophage des muses, musée du louvre.
site design: wonky muse.