February 5, 2005
The Real AgendaThe question that no one has answered to my satisfaction: how can diverting money from the traditional pension system -- which eliminates risk -- to private accounts --which are vulnerable to market risk -- "strengthen and save" Social Security?
The answer comes from the LA Times:
In a significant shift in his rationale for the accounts, Bush dropped his claim that they would help solve Social Security's fiscal problems — a link he sometimes made during last year's presidential campaign. Instead, he said the individual accounts were desirable because they would be "a better deal," providing workers what he said would be a higher rate of return and "greater security in retirement."The real agenda emerges. Privatization is not intended as a fix, it's intended to siphon off funds away from Social Security.
Oh, but there's more. From the AP:
So, not only is privatization not intended to rescue Social Security from a "crisis", it's intended to weaken it. Weaken it so it's eventually destroyed.
The heart of the issue here is not methodological, it's ideological. Conservatives who believe in the "each man for himself" society never believed in the Social Security system. They see the system as an impediment and a burden that taxpayers are better off without, so why would they try to save it, must less "strenghten" it?
The country can have a meaningful discourse about the merits of a social retirement program versus private retirement accounts if they would candidly admit this, but they won't because it's political suicide to do so.
+Save/Share | |
Links to this post:
(Dare to Know)
-- Epistularum Liber Primus, Horace
Wonk (noun): def. A political nerd. Know spelled backwards.
Wonky Muse is the other Filipino American female political blogger. The sane, liberal one.
Talking Points Memo
The Carpetbagger Report
The Huffington Post
follow me on Twitter
image: le sarcophage des muses, musée du louvre.
site design: wonky muse.